Exploring perceptions of english proficiency online testing (epot) among lecturers and students

A review in state polytechnic kupang

Authors

  • Rosdiana Mata State Polytechnic Kupang, Kupang, Indonesia
  • Yanti Secilia Giri State Polytechnic Kupang, Kupang, Indonesia
  • Simri Dida State Polytechnic Kupang, Kupang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Lecturer’s Perception, Student’s Perception, English Proficiency Online Test, Higer Education Policy , Academic Graduation Requirements

Abstract

This study explores the perceptions of lecturers and students regarding the English Proficiency Online Test (EPOT) used as an institutional language assessment at the State Polytechnic of Kupang. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through interviews and questionnaires to examine participants’ views on the relevance, effectiveness, and challenges of EPOT as an evaluative tool. The findings reveal varying levels of acceptance and concern, particularly in relation to test preparedness, technological readiness, and the alignment of EPOT with students’ actual language competencies. The study provides insights that can support improvements in English assessment practices and inform policy decisions related to graduation requirements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi (KemenPANRB), retrieved from http://www.menpan.go.id

English First English Proficiency Index 2024. . retrieved from https://www.ef.co.id/epi/

Hendrawaty N, Angkarini T, Retnomurti AB. Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions on Online English Proficiency Test. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran. 2023 Aug 1;56(2):310–23.

Emmiyati N, Maharani Asnur S, Ahmad A. Validity, Reliability, and Practicality of Test Items of Internet-Based English Proficiency Test for English Laboratory. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education) [Internet]. 2024;11(2):2024. Available from: http://10.15408/ijee.v11i2.37276

Galang RT, Arrozal JY, Lumanlan AD, Cortez L. English Proficiency Test and Academic Performance in Purposive Communication: A Correlation Study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research [Internet]. 2024 Dec 24;5(12):4945–52. Available from: https://ijmaberjournal.org/index.php/ijmaber/article/view/1973

Rohman KA, Budiana H, Hartini N. THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON A TEST OF ENGLISH PROFICIENCY AS GRADUATION REQUIREMENT. Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching [Internet]. 2019;22(2):171–81. Available from: http://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT

Rionaldi& Saputra B. Developing an English Proficiency Test for Higher Education. INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa. 2023;10(2):817–24

Pan YC. TEST IMPACT: ENGLISH CERTIFICATION EXIT REQUIREMENTS IN TAIWAN [Internet]. Jurnal TEFLIN. Malang; 2009. Available from: https://journal.teflin.org/index.php/journal/article/view/87

Wu J, Lee MCL. The relationships between test performance and students’ perceptions of learning motivation, test value, and test anxiety in the context of the English benchmark requirement for graduation in Taiwan’s universities. Language Testing in Asia [Internet]. 2017 Dec 1;7(1). Available from: https://languagetestingasia.springeropen.com/

Creswell, J. W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). 2014. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Sugiyono.2019.Metode Penelitian Kebijakan:Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R&D dan Penelitian Evaluasi.Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono.2018.Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.Bandung

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Mata, R., Secilia Giri, Y., & Dida, S. (2026). Exploring perceptions of english proficiency online testing (epot) among lecturers and students: A review in state polytechnic kupang. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 8(1), 16–23. Retrieved from https://www.growingscholar.org/journal/index.php/TIJOLAC/article/view/559

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): March

Section

Articles
Copyright & Licensing

Copyright (c) 2026 Rosdiana Mata, Yanti Secilia Giri, Simri Dida

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright is a property right, which exists to protect the expression of ideas and the use of works by authors and publishers of various types of works, including literary (e.g. books, newspapers, magazines and journals), artistic works (including photographs, paintings, sculptures, diagrams), musical works, sound recordings, films and broadcasts.

Copyright is one of several intellectual property (IP) rights that exist, including, amongst others, trademarks, patents and designs. Intellectual property is a fundamental right, as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (Article 17(2)).

Like with other types of property, copyright can be sold, purchased, licensed, transferred, or violated. However, owning a copyright protected work, such as a book for example, has to be distinguished from ownership of the copyright: buying the book does not mean that you then own the copyright in the book.

In this journal, the author(s) has/have got the copyright. The author(s) may share their works by reffering to this journal. If the author(s) do/ does not reffer to this journal then the author(s) is/are viewed as plagiator.