Variations in the use of kusshon kotoba in japanese directives speech
Keywords:
Kusshon Kotoba, Directive Speech, Politeness Strategies, Socio-Pragmatic Analysis, Japanese Language EducationAbstract
This paper investigates the variations in the use of kusshon kotoba (softening language) within Japanese directive speech, emphasizing its pivotal role in facilitating polite communication and navigating social hierarchies. Through a comprehensive analysis, we identify five distinct categories of directive speech: asking for time, refusing, proposing, denying opinion, and asking for opinion, each comprising a specific number of phrases that exemplify the nuanced application of kusshon kotoba. The study reveals that the utilization of these softening expressions is significantly influenced by contextual factors, including the social dynamics between speakers and listeners and the nature of the directives being communicated. Employing both quantitative and qualitative methodologies, this research integrates socio-pragmatic frameworks and the SPEAKING model to elucidate the complexities underlying Japanese politeness strategies. The findings highlight the challenges Japanese language learners face in appropriately selecting kusshon kotoba, which is crucial for effective and culturally sensitive communication. Furthermore, the study advocates for the inclusion of kusshon kotoba training in advanced Japanese language curricula, positing that such education can enhance learners' comprehension of politeness in interpersonal exchanges. Ultimately, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of language politeness as a reflection of societal values in Japan, underscoring the importance of context-sensitive language use in fostering meaningful communication within Japanese culture.
Downloads
References
Akbar, P. S., & Usman. (2008). Pengantar statistika. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Metodologi penelitian. Yogyakarta: Renika Cipta.
Dunn, C. D. (2011). Bentuk formal atau strategi verbal? Teori kesopanan dan pelatihan etiket bisnis Jepang. Journal of Pragmatics.
Elita, R. (2017). Isogashii tokoro dari sudut pandang hairyo hyougen: Kajian kesantunan berbahasa masyarakat Jepang. In The 3rd International Seminar on Linguistics (ISOL-3).
Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35-71). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Hirai, M. (1985). Nandemo wakaru shinkokugo handobukku. Tokyo: Sanseido.
Iori, I. (2000). Nihongo bunpou hando bukku. Tokyo: 3A Corporation.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Nomura, M. (1992). Nihongo jiten. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
Ogawa, Y. (1982). Nihongo kyouiku jiten. Tokyo: Daiosamu Toshokan.
Pradhana, N. I. (2023). Audio-visual sebagai strategi pembelajaran keigo pada siswa SMA. In The Third International Conference on Humanities, Education, Language and Culture (3rd ICHELAC).
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian: Pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2001). Metode penelitian bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tarigan, H. G. (1986). Pengajaran pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Ngurah Indra Pradhana, Rebecca Karenia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright is a property right, which exists to protect the expression of ideas and the use of works by authors and publishers of various types of works, including literary (e.g. books, newspapers, magazines and journals), artistic works (including photographs, paintings, sculptures, diagrams), musical works, sound recordings, films and broadcasts.
Copyright is one of several intellectual property (IP) rights that exist, including, amongst others, trademarks, patents and designs. Intellectual property is a fundamental right, as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (Article 17(2)).
Like with other types of property, copyright can be sold, purchased, licensed, transferred, or violated. However, owning a copyright protected work, such as a book for example, has to be distinguished from ownership of the copyright: buying the book does not mean that you then own the copyright in the book.
In this journal, the author(s) has/have got the copyright. The author(s) may share their works by reffering to this journal. If the author(s) do/ does not reffer to this journal then the author(s) is/are viewed as plagiator.




