Interlanguage in teaching indonesian to bilingual schools in bali
Keywords:
Interlanguage, Teaching, Bilingual SchoolAbstract
In learning a foreign language as a second language, all learners will face the process of creating an interlanguage. Selinker's hypothesis (1972) says that interlanguage is different from the mother tongue and from the target language (which is being learned). If the pragmatic study is connected with the interlanguage system, it will later become a study of how speakers and non-native speakers acquire, understand, and use linguistic patterns or speech acts in a second language. Selinker (1972) classifies problems in interlanguage, one of which is a methodological problem in which one type of empirical research suggests error analysis. Error analysis or abbreviated children is a limited instrument in the investigation of second language acquisition (PB2). Burt, Dulay, and Krashen (1982) differentiate areas (taxonomies) for language errors. The first is a taxonomy of linguistic categories that classify errors based on the components of language, namely phonology (speech), syntax and morphology (grammar; grammar), semantics and lexicon of meaning, and discourse (style). This study describes the interlanguage problem that is included in the "taxonomy of linguistic categories" that occurs in the speech process of teaching Indonesian at bilingual schools, namely Canggu Community School and Green School Bali.
Downloads
References
Bonvillain, N. (2019). Language, culture, and communication: The meaning of messages. Rowman & Littlefield.
Burns, T. W., O'Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: a contemporary definition. Public understanding of science, 12(2), 183-202.
Corps, R. E., Crossley, A., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). Early preparation during turn-taking: Listeners use content predictions to determine what to say but not when to say it. Cognition, 175, 77-95.
Edmonson, J. R., Hutchinson, J. M., & Nerbonne, M. A. (1981). Verbal transformation patterns in children with articulation defects. The Journal of Auditory Research, 21(2), 85-92.
Fishman, J. A. (2020). Who speaks what language to whom and when?. In The bilingualism reader (pp. 55-70). Routledge.
Fishman, S. E., & Anderson, W. G. (1971). Developing a system for describing teaching. Quest, 15(1), 9-16.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2021). Identity politics and trade policy. The Review of Economic Studies, 88(3), 1101-1126.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41-58). Brill.
Gunasari, N. P. C., Budiarsa, M., Artawa, K., & Satyawati, M. S. (2020). Code-Mixing in Communication Between Tour Guides: Balinese Case. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 2(01), 87-97.
Hornby, P. A. (1974). Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 13(5), 530-538.
Laksana, I. K. D. (2021). The discourse of Indonesian language in public domain: its use in public debate prior to the presidential election 2019. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 922-934.
Latupeirissa, D. S., Laksana, I. K. D., Artawa, K., & Sosiowati, I. G. A. G. (2018). Repetition in Indonesian political language. International journal of linguistics, literature and culture, 4(6), 72-80.
Latupeirissa, D. S., Laksana, I. K. D., Artawa, K., & Sosiowati, I. G. A. G. (2019). On political language ideology: Critical view of Indonesian president speech. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 843-850.
Levinson, S. C., Levinson, S. C., & Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge university press.
Poole, A. H. (2020). “Tearing the Shroud of Invisibility”: Communities of Protest Information Practices and the Fight for LGBTQ Rights in US Librarianship. The Library Quarterly, 90(4), 530-562.
Radez, J., Reardon, T., Creswell, C., Lawrence, P. J., Evdoka-Burton, G., & Waite, P. (2021). Why do children and adolescents (not) seek and access professional help for their mental health problems? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. European child & adolescent psychiatry, 30(2), 183-211.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. In Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 7-55). Academic Press.
Shaykhislamov, N. Z. U., & Makhmudov, K. S. U. (2020). Linguistics and Its Modern Types. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, (1), 358-361.
Taguchi, N. (2019). Second language acquisition and pragmatics: An overview. The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics, 1-14.
Tan, X., Qin, T., Soong, F., & Liu, T. Y. (2021). A survey on neural speech synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.15561.
Winch, P. (2020). Understanding a primitive society. In Arguing About Knowledge (pp. 530-552). Routledge.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Eka Dwi Putra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright is a property right, which exists to protect the expression of ideas and the use of works by authors and publishers of various types of works, including literary (e.g. books, newspapers, magazines and journals), artistic works (including photographs, paintings, sculptures, diagrams), musical works, sound recordings, films and broadcasts.
Copyright is one of several intellectual property (IP) rights that exist, including, amongst others, trademarks, patents and designs. Intellectual property is a fundamental right, as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (Article 17(2)).
Like with other types of property, copyright can be sold, purchased, licensed, transferred, or violated. However, owning a copyright protected work, such as a book for example, has to be distinguished from ownership of the copyright: buying the book does not mean that you then own the copyright in the book.
In this journal, the author(s) has/have got the copyright. The author(s) may share their works by reffering to this journal. If the author(s) do/ does not reffer to this journal then the author(s) is/are viewed as plagiator.
