Ontological metaphor in traditional marriage discourse of manggarai speech community-east indonesia
Cultural linguistic perspective
Keywords:
Ontological Metaphor, Traditional Marriage Discourse, Manggarai Speech Community, Culture Linguistic PerspectiveAbstract
This article is intended to analyze the ontological metaphor expressions used in traditional marriage discourse of Manggarai speech community (TMDMSC). It is also intended to uncover the imagery of MSC that is expressed in the ontological metaphors. Thus, this article used Cultural Linguistic Perspectif (CLP) as the main theory and metaphor as the supporting theory. Those theories were combined by applying the qualitative research method. Based on the data analysis, there were 17 ontological metaphor expressions used in TMDMSC. On the other hand, the ontological metaphor expressions almost include in paralelism expression. In line with this, the ontological metaphor has the literal and idiomatic meaning which depends on the imagery of MSC. Thus, based on the ontological metaphor expressions, it was also found the imagery that is appearing in TMDMSC such as; cultural, social, magical, ideological, mythical, and biological imagery. Those imageries that appeared in TMDMSC prove that (1) MSC believe that the God has power to control, protect, guidance, and curse the MSC’s life, (2) MSC believe that the ancestors have power to protect, guidance or even to curse the MSC’s life, and (3) MSC believe that ancestors are still alive like living human being.
Downloads
References
Duranti, A. (2009). “The relevance of Husserl’s theory to language socialization. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology”, 19 (2), 205–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1395.2009.01031.x
Erfiani, Y. P. F. (2018). “A Study on Methaphors in Ti’I Ka Embu Nusi Discourse in Rongga Language”. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 18 (1), 123-135.
Erfiani, Y. P. F. (2023). Metonymy in Traditional Marriage Discourse of Manggarai Speech Community: Cultural Linguistic Perspective. The International Journal of Social Sciences World, 5 (1), 101-111.
Fox, James J. 1986. Bahasa, Sastra dan Sejarah: Kumpulan Karangan Mengenai
Masyarakat Pulau Roti. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Lakoff, George. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories
Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moleong, Lexy. J. (2017). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. USA: University of Texas Press.
Sharifian, Farzad. (2017). Cultural Linguistics: Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publshing Company.
Sharifian, Farzad. (2015). “Cultural Linguistics and World Englishes”, John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Word Englishes, 1-18.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.
Sugiyono. (2009). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Verheijen, J. A. J. (1991). Manggarai dan Wujud Tertinggi, Jilid 1. Jakarta: LIPI RUL.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Yohanes Paulus Florianus Erfiani, I Wayan Simpen, I Made Netra, Ni Luh Nyoman Seri Malini

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright is a property right, which exists to protect the expression of ideas and the use of works by authors and publishers of various types of works, including literary (e.g. books, newspapers, magazines and journals), artistic works (including photographs, paintings, sculptures, diagrams), musical works, sound recordings, films and broadcasts.
Copyright is one of several intellectual property (IP) rights that exist, including, amongst others, trademarks, patents and designs. Intellectual property is a fundamental right, as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (Article 17(2)).
Like with other types of property, copyright can be sold, purchased, licensed, transferred, or violated. However, owning a copyright protected work, such as a book for example, has to be distinguished from ownership of the copyright: buying the book does not mean that you then own the copyright in the book.
In this journal, the author(s) has/have got the copyright. The author(s) may share their works by reffering to this journal. If the author(s) do/ does not reffer to this journal then the author(s) is/are viewed as plagiator.




