Turn-taking and cooperation principles on “Catatan Demokrasi Kita” and its implications in indonesian language learning

Authors

  • I Wayan Ardi Sumarta University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Simpen University of Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Ketut Darma Laksana University of Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Ketut Artawa University of Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

Cooperation Principles, Politician's Speech, Turn-taking, Learning

Abstract

Turn-taking is the part of conversation principles that can be used as a reference in speaking. The use of the conversion principle contains unique characteristics and styles of communication for each speaker. A talk show is an open stage for politicians to show their ability to speak and implement the speech strategy. However, the context of the conversion tends to change the conditions of the speech strategy. This research is qualitative. The data was collected by using the documentation method. The data sources were obtained from the conversations during the Talk Show "Catatan Demokrasi Kita" on the TV One 'channel. This study applied a formal method to present the result of the conversation data analysis in the classification table of the politician’s speech strategy. The informal method was used to express the speech that classified into how to take over the turn-taking and to apply the corporation principle. This research is also implied to Indonesian learning, especially speaking skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bonvillain, N. (2019). Language, culture, and communication: The meaning of messages. Rowman & Littlefield.

Burns, T. W., O'Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: a contemporary definition. Public understanding of science, 12(2), 183-202.

Corps, R. E., Crossley, A., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). Early preparation during turn-taking: Listeners use content predictions to determine what to say but not when to say it. Cognition, 175, 77-95.

Edmonson, J. R., Hutchinson, J. M., & Nerbonne, M. A. (1981). Verbal transformation patterns in children with articulation defects. The Journal of Auditory Research, 21(2), 85-92.

Fishman, J. A. (2020). Who speaks what language to whom and when?. In The bilingualism reader (pp. 55-70). Routledge.

Fishman, S. E., & Anderson, W. G. (1971). Developing a system for describing teaching. Quest, 15(1), 9-16.

Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2021). Identity politics and trade policy. The Review of Economic Studies, 88(3), 1101-1126.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41-58). Brill.

Gunasari, N. P. C., Budiarsa, M., Artawa, K., & Satyawati, M. S. (2020). Code-Mixing in Communication Between Tour Guides: Balinese Case. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 2(01), 87-97.

Hornby, P. A. (1974). Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 13(5), 530-538.

Laksana, I. K. D. (2021). Discourse of Indonesian language in public domain: its use in public debate prior to the presidential election 2019. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 922-934.

Latupeirissa, D. S., Laksana, I. K. D., Artawa, K., & Sosiowati, I. G. A. G. (2018). Repetition in Indonesian political language. International journal of linguistics, literature and culture, 4(6), 72-80.

Latupeirissa, D. S., Laksana, I. K. D., Artawa, K., & Sosiowati, I. G. A. G. (2019). On political language ideology: Critical view of Indonesian president speech. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 843-850.

Levinson, S. C., Levinson, S. C., & Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge university press.

Poole, A. H. (2020). “Tearing the Shroud of Invisibility”: Communities of Protest Information Practices and the Fight for LGBTQ Rights in US Librarianship. The Library Quarterly, 90(4), 530-562.

Radez, J., Reardon, T., Creswell, C., Lawrence, P. J., Evdoka-Burton, G., & Waite, P. (2021). Why do children and adolescents (not) seek and access professional help for their mental health problems? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. European child & adolescent psychiatry, 30(2), 183-211.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. In Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 7-55). Academic Press.

Shaykhislamov, N. Z. U., & Makhmudov, K. S. U. (2020). Linguistics and Its Modern Types. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, (1), 358-361.

Taguchi, N. (2019). Second language acquisition and pragmatics: An overview. The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics, 1-14.

Tan, X., Qin, T., Soong, F., & Liu, T. Y. (2021). A survey on neural speech synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.15561.

Winch, P. (2020). Understanding a primitive society. In Arguing About Knowledge (pp. 530-552). Routledge.

Published

2022-03-30

How to Cite

Sumarta, I. W. A., Simpen, I. W., Laksana, I. K. D., & Artawa, K. (2022). Turn-taking and cooperation principles on “Catatan Demokrasi Kita” and its implications in indonesian language learning. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 4(1), 77–85. Retrieved from https://www.growingscholar.org/journal/index.php/TIJOLAC/article/view/237

Issue

Section

Articles