Ambai, ansus, menawi and biak languages in papua

A premiere report of comparative study

Authors

Keywords:

Genetic relationship, Reconstruction, Sub-group, Papuan

Abstract

This study compares the Ambai, Ansus, Menawi, and Biak languages of Saireri Bay, Papua. These non-Austronesian languages are closely related (SIL, 2000). This research tries to identify genetic evidence linking these four languages. 200 fundamental Swadesh words were studied. This research uses a comparative approach including observation, interview, and documentation. Based on lexicostatistics from 200 Swedish basic vocabularies, the highest connected cognates reach 47%, while the lower-level approach 38%. The regency has more linked vocabulary than other languages. Qualitative evidences are common phonological and lexical innovations that reinforce quantitative evidences. PAAMB *j becoming /z/ and /d/, *h becoming /O/ on Biak. Metathesis, omission, and phoneme addition also occurred. After reconstruction, Proto-language Ansus-Ambai-Menawi and Biak (PAAMB) phonemes are five vowels and 15 consonant phonemes. The vowels of PAAMB are I *e, *a, *o, and *u, while the consonants are *p, *m, *h, and *b, *w, *f, *t, *d, *n, *s *r, *j, *k, *g, *y, and *h.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bynon, T. (1990). Historical Linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.

Capell, A. (1938). The linguistic position of South Eastern Papua. University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies (United Kingdom).

De Vries, L. (2005). Towards a typology of tail–head linkage in Papuan languages. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”, 29(2), 363-384.

Dunn, M., Reesink, G. P., & Terrill, A. (2002). The East Papuan languages: A preliminary typological appraisal. Oceanic Linguistics, 41(1), 28-62.

Durie, M., & Ross, M. (Eds.). (1996). The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change. Oxford University Press.

Dyen, I., Kruskal, J. B., & Black, P. (1992). An Indoeuropean classification: A lexicostatistical experiment. Transactions of the American Philosophical society, 82(5), iii-132.

Gonzales, R. (2019). Evolution of Phonology in Language: Case of Timor Leste. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 1(01), 1-11.

Heeschen, V. (1982). Some systems of spatial deixis in Papuan languages. Here and there. Cross-linguistic studies in deixis and demonstration, 81-109.

Jannah, S. N. R. (2018). Language Kinship between Tulambatu and Tolaki Language in North Konawe. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 91.

Mbakop, A. W. N. (2021). The Language of Evangelisation in'Foreign'Territories: The case of Maroua, Cameroon. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 3(2), 29-45.

Ross, M. (2005). Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 572, 15-65.

Ruhlen, M. (2022). On the origin of languages. In On the Origin of Languages. Stanford University Press.

Schmidt, K. H. (1992). Contributions from new data to the reconstruction of the proto-language. EC Polomé & Winter, W.,(arg.), Reconstruting languages and cultures. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York, 35-62.

Sidwell, P. (2002). Genetic classification of the Bahnaric languages: a comprehensive review. MONKHMER STUDIES, 1-24.

Published

2022-06-13

How to Cite

Ingam, B. (2022). Ambai, ansus, menawi and biak languages in papua: A premiere report of comparative study. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 4(1), 32–45. Retrieved from https://www.growingscholar.org/journal/index.php/TIJOLAC/article/view/222

Issue

Section

Articles