The form of environment ecolexicon found in the balinese translation

Authors

  • Putu Chrisma Dewi Universitas Dhyana Pura, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Ketut Artawa Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Ida Bagus Putra Yadya Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Simpen Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

Form, Environment Ecolexicon, Ecolinguistics, Balinese, Gospel of Matthew

Abstract

This paper discusses the forms of environmental ecolexicon found in the Balinese translation of the Gospel of Matthew. In this research, the writer used the descriptive qualitative method. The data consist of primary and secondary data sources. The primary data sources were taken from the Gospel of Matthew, both in English and Balinese, as well as the results of interviews. At the same time, the secondary data sources were taken from the books outside the Bible, as well as various libraries related to this study. The method used in collecting the data was recording and interviews. The data that were collected were grouped based on the grammatical forms, word categories, and ecological elements. Then,  the grouped data were analyzed qualitatively based on the ecolinguistic theory given by Bang and Door (2000). The result shows that the forms of environmental ecolexicon found in the Balinese translation of the Gospel of Matthew were categorized into three main parts, namely: (a) Biological dimension, which consists of grammatical form, word category, and  element of ccology, (b) sociologist dimension, and (c) ideologies dimension.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atkinson, J. M. (1983). Religions in dialogue: the construction of an Indonesian minority religion. American Ethnologist, 10(4), 684-696.

Bang & Door (2000). ‘Ecology, Ethics & Communication, Dialectical Ecolinguistics: Edited by Anna Vibeke Lindo and Jeppe Bundsgaard. (p.53 - 84) Denmark: University of Odense.’

Bevans, S. (1985). Models of contextual theology. Missiology, 13(2), 185-202.

Byrne, M. M. (2001). Understanding life experiences through a phenomenological approach to research. AORN journal, 73(4), 830-830.

Catford, John Cunnison (1965). 'A Linguistic Theory of Translation: An Essay in Applied Linguistics, London: Oxford University Press

De Vries, L. (2001). Bible translations: Forms and functions. The Bible Translator, 52(3), 306-319.

Jiang, W. (2000). The relationship between culture and language. ELT journal, 54(4), 328-334.

Manafe, E., Budiarsa, M., & Rajeg, I. M. (2020). Analysis of Translation Method in Translating The Indonesian Bible to Kupang Malay Language. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 2(01), 32-47.

Metzger, B. M. (1993). Important early translations of the Bible. Bibliotheca Sacra, 150(597), 35-49.

Richards, E. R., & O'Brien, B. J. (2012). Misreading scripture with Western eyes: Removing cultural blinders to better understand the Bible. InterVarsity Press.

Schultz, R. (2012). Out of context: How to avoid misinterpreting the Bible. Baker Books.

Sudaryanto (1993). ‘Metode Dan Teknik Analisis Bahasa . Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Von Krogh, G., Rossi-Lamastra, C., & Haefliger, S. (2012). Phenomenon-based research in management and organisation science: When is it rigorous and does it matter?. Long range planning, 45(4), 277-298.

Published

2022-06-13

How to Cite

Putu Chrisma Dewi, Artawa, I. K., Yadya, I. B. P., & Simpen, I. W. (2022). The form of environment ecolexicon found in the balinese translation. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 4(1), 24–31. Retrieved from https://www.growingscholar.org/journal/index.php/TIJOLAC/article/view/208

Issue

Section

Articles