An Analysis of English Learning Style in Increasing Learning Achievement

Authors

  • Deby Malelak University of UPG '45, Kupang, Indonesia
  • Abigail Paranduk University of UPG '45, Kupang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Learning Style, Learning Achievement, Auditory, Visual, Kinesthetic

Abstract

The method used in this writing is descriptive; it describes the English Learning styles practiced by students. The research was conducted on the students of the State Senior High School (SMA N) 1 Rote Selatan - Indonesia. Therefore, this writing only presented the data relating to the fact or condition naturally without intervention or experimental manipulation from the writer. The subjects of this study are the students of the grade XII of science class. The instrument used to get the data is a questionnaire. The data analysis is based on descriptive analysis in which the data is tabulated and described in the form of words and sentences. This study indicated that both sciences classes used three learning styles for learning English: auditory, visual, and kinesthetic. However, the percentages of these styles vary from one to another. The data by visual showed that the most frequencies style, the students used by auditory 39%, followed by visual 34%, and the least one is kinesthetic 27%. The discrepancy of teaching methods- with the needs of students - impacts learning outcomes, which shows that there is no attraction for students to learn because teachers often only focus on one approach to the sense of hearing, in this case, auditory. It makes students bored and considers learning more difficult.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

As' ad, S., Sudira, P., & Hasriani, A. (2021). The Affecting Factors Difficulty in Learning: Case in Vocational School Students. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 3(01), 155-164.

Dolegui, A. S. (2013). The impact of listening to music on cognitive performance. Inquiries Journal, 5(09).

Ghorbani, T. (2020). Investigating the Values and Behaviors of ESP Teachers and Their Experience in Classrooms. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 2(02), 1-7.

Hagger, H., Burn, K., Mutton, T., & Brindley, S. (2008). Practice makes perfect? Learning to learn as a teacher. Oxford Review of Education, 34(2), 159-178.

Ironsi, C. S. (2021). Strategies For Student Participation with Remote Online Learning: Instructor Expectations. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 3(01), 24-36.

Keefe, J. W. (1987). Learning Style Theory and Practice. National Association of Secondary School Principals, 1904 Association Dr., Reston, VA 22091.

LeFever, M. D. (1995). Learning styles: Reaching everyone God gave you to teach. David C Cook.

Matheson, J. (2011). The case for rational uniqueness. Logos & Episteme, 2(3), 359-373.

McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2008). Future learning landscapes: Transforming pedagogy through social software. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(5).

Mitchell, T. M., Caruana, R., Freitag, D., McDermott, J., & Zabowski, D. (1994). Experience with a learning personal assistant. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 80-91.

Samudra, J. K. (2008). Memory in our body: Thick participation and the translation of kinesthetic experience. American ethnologist, 35(4), 665-681.

Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & education, 55(3), 945-948.

Published

2021-09-28

How to Cite

Malelak, D., & Paranduk, A. . . (2021). An Analysis of English Learning Style in Increasing Learning Achievement. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 3(2), 97–107. Retrieved from https://www.growingscholar.org/journal/index.php/TIJOLAC/article/view/158

Issue

Section

Articles