Cultural Values of Oko Mama: Marriage Proposal Ritual Speech In Bokong Community- Indonesia
Keywords:
Marriage Proposal Cultural, Values, Oko Mama, Ritual Speech, Cultural LinguisticsAbstract
This paper discussed the cultural values of Oko Mama speech. The Oko Mama itself is a marriage proposal ritual in Bokong Community, Indonesia. The descriptive qualitative method was applied together with observation and interview techniques. Data of observation and interview were the primary data sources. Meanwhile, the secondary data sources were documents related to the problems. The results showed that the cultural values implied in oko mama, namely: (a) social value which consists of cooperative value and the appreciation to girl’s parents value, and (b) religious value.
Downloads
References
Bustan, F. (2005). Wacana budaya tudak dalam ritual penti pada kelompok etnik Manggarai di Flores Barat: sebuah nalisis linguistik kebudayaan. Disertasi. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Udayana. Denpasar.
Duranti, A. (2001). Linguistic anthropology: History, ideas, and issues. Linguistic anthropology: A reader, 1-38.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective.
Hornby, A. S. (1998). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Editor Jonathan Crowther.
Koentjaraningrat. 1984. Kebudayaan, Mentalitas dan Pembangunan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Kuper, A. dan Jessica, K. 2000. Ensiklopedi Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Diterjemahkan oleh H. Munandar, et al. Cetakan I. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Latupeirissa, D. S. (2014). Diskriminasi Gender Dalam Penggunaan Bahasa Indonesia Di Surat Kabar Pos Kupang Dan Timor Express: Sebuah Analisis Wacana Kritis. Unpublished Theses. Kupang: Universitas Nusa Cendana
Latupeirissa, D. S., Laksana, I. K. D., Artawa, K., & Sosiowati, I. G. A. G. Lingual Investigation of President Soekarno Speech: A Report. e-Journal of Linguistics, 13(2), 275-238.
Latupeirissa, D. S., Laksana, I. K. D., Artawa, K., & Sosiowati, I. G. A. G. (2019). On Political Language Ideology: Critical View of Indonesian President Speech. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 843-850.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics Longman.
Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A. (1923). The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism (Vol. 29). K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company, Limited.
Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. University of Texas Press.
Samarin, William J. 1988. Ilmu Bahasa Lapangan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius. Setiadi. 2006. Ilmu Sosial Budaya Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
Soh. Andre Z. 1989. Kebudayaan Lontar Suatu Study Tentang Pola Kehidupan Suku Bangsa Rote, Museum NTT: Kupang. Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright is a property right, which exists to protect the expression of ideas and the use of works by authors and publishers of various types of works, including literary (e.g. books, newspapers, magazines and journals), artistic works (including photographs, paintings, sculptures, diagrams), musical works, sound recordings, films and broadcasts.
Copyright is one of several intellectual property (IP) rights that exist, including, amongst others, trademarks, patents and designs. Intellectual property is a fundamental right, as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (Article 17(2)).
Like with other types of property, copyright can be sold, purchased, licensed, transferred, or violated. However, owning a copyright protected work, such as a book for example, has to be distinguished from ownership of the copyright: buying the book does not mean that you then own the copyright in the book.
In this journal, the author(s) has/have got the copyright. The author(s) may share their works by reffering to this journal. If the author(s) do/ does not reffer to this journal then the author(s) is/are viewed as plagiator.




