Grammatical Errors in English Descriptive Essay

Indonesian Case

Authors

  • I Gede Adi Mahardika Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Nengah Sudipa Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Ketut Artawa Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

Errors, Grammar, Interlanguage, Intralingual, Surface strategy taxonomy

Abstract

The current research was conducted at a high school (SMAK Harapan Denpasar) located in Indonesia. It aims to analyze grammatical errors in descriptive writing of grade X students and analyze the factors that cause these errors. The data was taken from descriptive writings about family members. It was collected through the linguistics field technique. Next, it was analyzed by the surface strategy taxonomic theory that proposed by Dulay et al. This theory classified errors into omissions, additions, misformations, and misorderings. The sources of errors were analyzed by the interlanguage and intralingual errors proposed by Richard. The result of the study shows that there are 248 errors. The errors consist of 147 omissions, 79 misformations, 45 additions, and 13 misorderings. The sources of errors are interlanguage and intralingual factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Belhiah, H., & Elhami, M. (2015). English as a medium of instruction in the Gulf: When students and teachers speak. Language Policy, 14(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9336-9

Corder, S.P. (1982). Error Analysis and Interlanguage. London: Oxford University Press.

Dan, L. D., Artawa, K., Budiarsa, M., Suastra, I. M., & Septevany, E. (2021). Pronunciation Errors of Indonesian Mandarin Learners. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 3(01), 66-82.

Dulay, H., Burt, M. and Kreshen, S. (1982). Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.

Garvin, P. L. (2019). On linguistic method. De Gruyter Mouton.

Ghorbani, T. (2020). Investigating the Values and Behaviors of ESP Teachers and Their Experience in Classrooms. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 2(02), 1-7.

James, C. (1998). Errors in Language Learning and Use. New York: Routledge.

ONeill, R., & Russell, A. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of The English Language. New York: Longman.

Richards, J. C., & Bohlke, D. (2011). Creating effective language lessons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C. (1974). Error Analysis Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. London: Longman.

Saville-Troike, M. (2012). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sudaryanto (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistis). Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Sudipa, I N., Rajeg, I M., & Laksminy, L.P. (2011). Interferensi: Pengaruh Bahasa Indonesia dalam Bahasa Inggris. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.

Walija (1996). Bahasa Indonesia dalam Perbincangan. Jakarta: IKIP Muhammadiyah Jakarta Press.

Zanches, M. (2021). Translation Errors: Their Advantages for Linguistic Competence. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 3(01), 36-45.

Published

2021-07-18

How to Cite

Mahardika, I. G. A., Sudipa, I. N., & Artawa, I. K. (2021). Grammatical Errors in English Descriptive Essay: Indonesian Case. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 3(2), 11–17. Retrieved from https://www.growingscholar.org/journal/index.php/TIJOLAC/article/view/123

Issue

Section

Articles