The Study of Task-based Cycle: Case of Reading Comprehension Classes in Iran

Authors

Keywords:

TEFL, Reading, Iran, task-based

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of task-based cycle on Iranian Elementary EFL learners' reading comprehension. In order to accomplish the research, two intact classes, including 84 engineering EFL learners (studying pre-university course) were chosen in Tabriz Azad University. An experimental method of research was employed. The experimental group was taught according to the elements of task-based cycle proposed by Willis & Willis (2007). The control group didn’t receive such treatment. After eight sessions (3 months), a post-test was given. The analysis of the obtained data, carried out through t-test, revealed a significant difference between control and experimental group on the dependent variable, reading comprehension. The results of  the present study may have pedagogical implications for instruction and curriculum development.

References

Allwright, R. L. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? 1. ELT Journal, 36(1), 5-18.
Bowen, T., (2004). Task-based Learning. Retrieved from file: www.onestopenglish.com/ News/Magszine/Archive/taskbased.htm-15k.
Buyukkarc, K. (2009). A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF TASK-BASED LEARNING. Kastamonu Education Journal, 17(1), 313-320.
Ellis, R. (2002). The Evaluation of Communicative Tasks, in B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials Development in Language Teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 217-238.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ellis, R. (2006). The methodology of task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 1-17.
Foley, J. (1991). A Psycholinguistic Framework for Task-based Approaches to Language Teaching. Applied Linguistics. 12, 62-75
Ki, W. W. (2000). ICT Applications in Task-Based Learning. In N. Law and et. al. Changing Classrooms & Changing Schools: A Study of Good Practices in Using ICT in Hong Kong Schools (pp: 79-91). Hong Kong, Friendship Printing Co., Ltd.
Long, M. H., & Crooks, J. (1992). Three Approaches to Task-Based Syllabus Design. TESOL QUARTERLY, 26(1), 127-144.
Mckinnon, M. & Rigby, N. (2004). Task-based Learning. Macmillan publishers Ltd.
Nahavandi, N. (2011). The effect of task-based activities on EFL learners' reading comprehension. In Mukundan, J., Nimehchisalem, V., Menon, S., Jin, Y.J., Roslim, R., Leong, A., Mohamad, A. & Philip, A. (Eds.). (2011). ELT Matters 5 (pp.56-69). Petalingjaya, Malaysia: Galaxy.
Nahavandi, N. (2013). Task-based activities in reading comprehension classes: Task-based language teaching & learning. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
Nahavandi , N. & Mukundan, J. (2012). Task-based language teaching from teachers’ perspective. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1 (6), 115-121. doi:10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.6p.115, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.6p.115.
Nahavandi , N. & Mukundan, J. (2013a). Foreign Language Learning Anxiety among Iranian EFL learners Along Gender & Different Proficiency Levels. Language in India. 13(1), 133-161.
Nahavandi , N. & Mukundan, J. (2013b). Iranian EFL Engineering Students’ Motivational Orientations towards English Language Learning along Gender and Further Education in Language Institutes. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(1), doi:10.5296/ijl.v5i1.2684.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative Tasks and the Language Curriculum, TESOL QUARTERLY, 15(2), 279-295.
Nunan, D. (2001). Aspects of Task-Based Syllabus Design. Retrieved from file: www.telus.net/linguistic issues/syllabus design.html-20-k.
Prabhu, N.S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rivers, W. M. (1981). Teaching Foreign Language Skills (2nd ed), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Skehan, P. (1996). A Framework for Implementation of Task-based Instruction, Applied Linguistics, 17(1), Oxford University Press, 38-59.
Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction. Applied Linguistics 26 (3), 376–401. Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Published

2020-02-25

How to Cite

Sayd, M. (2020). The Study of Task-based Cycle: Case of Reading Comprehension Classes in Iran. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 2(01), 22–31. Retrieved from https://www.growingscholar.org/journal/index.php/TIJOLAC/article/view/12

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 01 (2020): March

Section

Articles
Copyright & Licensing

Copyright is a property right, which exists to protect the expression of ideas and the use of works by authors and publishers of various types of works, including literary (e.g. books, newspapers, magazines and journals), artistic works (including photographs, paintings, sculptures, diagrams), musical works, sound recordings, films and broadcasts.

Copyright is one of several intellectual property (IP) rights that exist, including, amongst others, trademarks, patents and designs. Intellectual property is a fundamental right, as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (Article 17(2)).

Like with other types of property, copyright can be sold, purchased, licensed, transferred, or violated. However, owning a copyright protected work, such as a book for example, has to be distinguished from ownership of the copyright: buying the book does not mean that you then own the copyright in the book.

In this journal, the author(s) has/have got the copyright. The author(s) may share their works by reffering to this journal. If the author(s) do/ does not reffer to this journal then the author(s) is/are viewed as plagiator.