The role of sports in government-led social integration in the modernization process of singapore
Keywords:
Singapore;, Social Integration;, Elite Sports, Mass Fintess;, HistoryAbstract
The relationship between sports development and social integration in Singapore, as a multicultural country, has garnered significant attention. This study aims to investigate the role of sports in the government-led social integration process in Singapore through a review of existing scholarly literature on social integration and sports, employing methods such as literature review, case studies, and theoretical analysis. By framing the government's sports policies in Singapore within the context of nation-building and social consensus building, this study delineates two aspects: the construction of national identity through sports and the construction of social consensus through sports. Building upon this framework, the analysis is grounded in the social integration theories of Habermas and Durkheim, focusing on reshaping solidarity, identity formation, group and individual moral shaping, and the extension of the communication domain. Through this framework, the study analyzes the role of sports as a tool for social integration under government leadership. It concludes that in Singapore's modernization process, sports are a policy tool entirely led by the government for social integration; sports activities provide a common platform for people of different races and social classes; sports hold significant importance for Singapore's national image and community identity; and sports, as a public communication domain, facilitate interaction among society members. However, it also acknowledges that sports still face challenges in social integration related to issues such as race, class, and distribution.
Downloads
References
Aiyer, S. (2007). From colonial segregation to postcolonial 'integration': Constructing ethnic difference through Singapore's Little India and the Singapore 'Indian'.
Alba, R., & Nee, V. (1997). Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration. International Migration Review, 31(4), 826-874.
Allen, K. A., Kern, M. L., Rozek, C. S., McInerney, D., & Slavich, G. M. (2021). Belonging: A review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 87-102.
Anwar, N. D. (2014). Immigration and Singaporean identity: The ethnicity conundrum. RSIS Commentary, 2014(211), 27.
Cheang, B., & Lim, H. (2023). Institutional diversity and state-led development: Singapore as a unique variety of capitalism. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 67, 182-192.
Chew, W. C. E., Chung, H. J., & Lee, J. W. (2017). Sports clubs and organizations in changing times: The case of Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Sport and Social Science, 6(1), 71-86.
Chin, J. (2023). The PAP model: Can the 4G hold on to power? The Round Table, 112(2), 173-182.
Durkheim, E. (2005). Suicide: A study in sociology. Routledge.
Durkheim, É. (1893). The Division of Labor in Society. Free Press.
Ekholm, D. (2019). Sport as a means of governing social integration: Discourses on bridging and bonding social relations. Sociology of Sport Journal, 36(2), 152-161.
Fairclough, G. H. (1991). Habermas' concept of “Lifeworld”. Systems Practice, 4, 547-563.
Fidel, R. (1984). The case study method: A case study. Library and Information Science Research, 6(3), 273-288.
Fry, J. M., & McNeill, M. C. (2011). ‘In the Nation’s good’ Physical education and school sport in Singapore. European Physical Education Review, 17(3), 287-300.
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (2001). The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. MIT Press.
Hamilton-Hart, N. (2009). Indonesia and Singapore: Structure, politics and interests. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 249-271.
Horton, P. (2013). Sports clubs in colonial Singapore: Insiders, outsiders, aspirants. International Sports Studies, 35(1).
Horton, P. A. (2002). Shackling the lion: Sport and modern Singapore. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 19(2-3), 243-274.
Horton, P. A. (2013). Complex creolization: The evolution of modern sport in Singapore. In Europe, Sport, World (pp. 77-104). Routledge.
Hylton, K. (2011). Sport and social integration. In Routledge handbook of sports development (pp. 100-113). Routledge.
Jasso, G. (1988). Principles of theoretical analysis. Sociological Theory, 6, 1-20.
Johnson, J. (1991). Habermas on strategic and communicative action. Political Theory, 19(2), 181-201.
Lee, K. Y. (1973, July 21). Olympic gold or bust, Singapore. The Straits Times, p. 46.
Liao, E. B. (2021). Creating and mobilizing “Syonan” youth: Youth and the Japanese occupation of Singapore, 1942-1945. Archipel. Études Interdisciplinaires sur le Monde Insulindien, 2021(102), 65-97.
Lian, K. F. (2016). Multiculturalism in Singapore: Concept and practice. In Multiculturalism, Migration, and the Politics of Identity in Singapore (pp. 11-29).
Lim, L. K., & Horton, P. (2011). Sport in Syonan (Singapore) 1942–1945: Centralisation and nipponisation. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 28(6), 895-924.
Malm, C., Jakobsson, J., & Isaksson, A. (2019). Physical activity and sports—real health benefits: A review with insight into the public health of Sweden. Sports, 7(5), 127.
Mauzy, D. K., & Milne, R. S. (2002). Singapore Politics under the People's Action Party. Psychology Press.
Mechtraud, S. (1955). Durkheim's concept of solidarity. Philippine Sociological Review, 23-27.
Merton, R. K. (1994). Durkheim's division of labor in society. Sociological Forum, 9, 17-25.
Møen, A. (2019). Democracy and public communication: A Durkheimian lens on Habermas. Acta Sociologica, 62(1), 20-33.
Mouzelis, N. (1992). Social and system integration: Habermas' view. British Journal of Sociology, 267-288.
Noor, N. M., & Leong, C. H. (2013). Multiculturalism in Malaysia and Singapore: Contesting models. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(6), 714-726.
People's Association Community Sports Club. (n.d.). Developing new sports initiatives to cultivate citizen-ownership for a unified community.
Prakash, P. (2019). The Leviathan and its muscular management of social cohesion in Singapore. In Social Cohesion in Asia (pp. 50-73). Routledge.
Rubio, K. (2014). Preservation of memory: The social responsibility of Olympic Games.
Sam, M. P. (2009). The public management of sport: Wicked problems, challenges and dilemmas. Public Management Review, 11(4), 499-514.
Singapore Demographics Profile. (n.d.).
Singapore Department of Statistics (DOS). (n.d.).
Singapore Parliament. (1991). Shared values white paper.
Singapore Schools Sports Council (SSSC). (n.d.). History & milestones.
Sim, L. L., Yu, S. M., & Han, S. S. (2003). Public housing and ethnic integration in Singapore. Habitat International, 27(2), 293-307.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
Tacon, R. (2018). Sport policy and the structure of sport in the UK. In Managing Sport Business (pp. 58-76). Routledge.
Turner, B. S., & Durkheim, E. (2013). Professional ethics and civic morals. Routledge.
