The principle of justice towards employment in the era of globalization in the perspective of labor law in indonesia
Keywords:
Principles of Justice, Labor, Employment LawAbstract
This research aims to find out the legal substance of the principle of justice that is appropriate for workers in the era of globalization and to find government policies regarding the importance of workforce flexibility in dealing with unemployment. The research results show that the legal substance of the principle of justice is appropriate for workers in the era of globalization, with the principle that every citizen has equal rights and everyone is equal before the law. Likewise, Mochtar Kusumaatmadja's legal theory of development is the basis for government intervention in implementing the principle of social justice. Social justice does not mean ignoring the rights of others. Social justice does not justify compulsion to ignore the rights of others, nor is it to protect against mistakes or illegal actions that harm someone's property rights that have been protected by law. Government policies regarding the importance of labor flexibility in overcoming unemployment, where the policy pursued is to create formal employment and increase worker productivity carried out by creating labor market flexibility by improving the rules of the workforce related to recruitment, outsourcing, wages, layoffs, and improving the rules which resulted in excessive protection for both workers and employers.
Downloads
References
Aryateja, K. B., Susita, D., & Sebayang, K. D. A. (2021). The influence of work-life balance and work environment on employee commitment. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 3(2), 152-168.
Brown, C., Block, W. E., & Wirth, H. E. (2019). Free market for the environment. Экономическая политика, 14(1), 116-125.
Durrenberger, E. P. (2003). Global processes, local systems. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 253-279.
GIL, J. (2020). Chapter Three Bodies and Functioning: India Experiences in the Capabilities Approaches of Amartya Sen. Spiritual and Corporeal Selves in India: Approaches in a Global World, 32.
Hayashi, M. (2021). Democracy against labor movement: Japan’s anti-labor developmental state and aftermaths. Critical Sociology, 47(1), 37-58.
Lester, J. N., Cho, Y., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to do qualitative data analysis: A starting point. Human resource development review, 19(1), 94-106.
Li, X. P. (2020). A critical analysis of globalization in China daily newspaper. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 2(01), 1-21.
Lucas-Rhimbassen, M. (2022). The COST of Joining Legal Forces on a Celestial Body of Law and Beyond: Anticipating Future Clashes between Corpus Juris Spatialis, Lex Mercatoria, Antitrust and Ethics. Space Policy, 59, 101445.
Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Keshri, A., & Sabaretnam, M. (2019). Selection of appropriate statistical methods for data analysis. Annals of cardiac anaesthesia, 22(3), 297.
Nash, L. (2019). Advancing Intelligence and Global Society: International Laws Role in Governing the Advance of Artificial Intelligence. Kentucky Law Journal.
Paul, T. V. (2021). Globalization, deglobalization and reglobalization: adapting liberal international order. International Affairs, 97(5), 1599-1620.




