The perspective of meroh in the irires tribe
Keywords:
Perspective, Irires tribe, Meroh, Papua, CultureAbstract
Each socio-cultural ethnic group has its uniqueness and distinctive characteristics, such as the perspective of Meroh in the Irires ethnic group. The lexicon meroh consists of two meanings: mer, which means tree, and roh, which means body or life. This perspective is a view that is destructive because it seeks to destroy humans or other people genealogically. The destruction is carried out systematically, massively, measured, and directedly. This system can only be stopped or resolved by compensating the victim's family so that the system stops and does not continue from generation to generation. Therefore, before committing an act or deed, it must be thought out wisely and prudently so as not to have a humanist approach to a problem, not a destructive one. The perspective of Meroh in the Irires tribe is a view that relates to past actions or deeds. These actions occur due to several factors, such as feelings of hurt and also the factors of customary conspiracy (ic mouc).
Downloads
References
Ahimsa, P. (1985). Etnosains dan Etnometodologi” dalam Masyarakat Indonesia Majalah Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Indonesia. Agustus Jilid XII Nomor, 2.
Bangham, J. (2014). Writing, printing, speaking: Rhesus blood-group genetics and nomenclatures in the mid-twentieth century. The British Journal for the History of Science, 47(2), 335-361.
Clark, E. V. (2017). Morphology in language acquisition. The handbook of morphology, 374-389.
de Paula Arruda Filho, N. (2017). The agenda 2030 for responsible management education: An applied methodology. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 183-191.
Duranti, A. (2011). Linguistic anthropology: Language as a non-neutral medium. The Cambridge handbook of sociolinguistics, 28-46.
Ekasriadi, I. A. A., Artawa, K., Dhanawaty, N. M., & Sutama, P. (2021). Personal deixis reversal of Balinese language. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 3(2), 72-85.
Gilbert, N., & Stoneman, P. (Eds.). (2015). Researching social life. Sage.
Keraf, A. S. (2010). Etika lingkungan hidup. Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Koerner, E. F. (2013). Ferdinand de Saussure: Origin and development of his linguistic thought in western studies of language (Vol. 7). Springer-Verlag.
Liswahyuningsih, N. L. G., Artawa, K., Udayana, I. N., & Satyawati, M. S. (2020). Indonesian-English Translation of Idiomatic Noun Phrases: Its Techniques Review. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 2(1), 65-74.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics: Volume 2 (Vol. 2). Cambridge university press..
Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study (Vol. 2, pp. 214-253). The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods.
Phillipson, M. (1972). Phenomenological philosophy and sociology. New directions in sociological theory, 1, 119-163.
Rahardi, K. (2009). Bahasa Indonesia untuk perguruan tinggi. Jakarta: Erlangga, 13.
Sapir, E. (2003). Language, race and culture. The language, ethnicity and race reader, 28-35.
Sibar Sibarani, R. (2020). Anthropolingustics as Interdisciplinary Approach. Journal of Anthropolinguistics, 1(1), 1-8.
Silverman, D. (1972). Some neglected questions about social reality. New Directions in Sociological Theory, 165-182.
Spradley, J. P. (1972). Adaptive strategies of urban nomads. Culture and cognition: Rules, maps, and plans, 235-78.
Suryati, N. M., Suteja, I. W., & Jirnaya, I. K. (2022). Category of noun lexical meaning in balinese. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 4(2), 215-223.
Voegelin, C. F., & Voegelin, F. M. (1976). Classification and Index of the World's Languages.
Wieder, D. L. (1974). Language and social reality: The case of telling the convict code. De Gruyter.
