Hegemonic ideology and symbolic violence of balinese language in the marriage tradition
A gender perspective
Keywords:
Hegemonic Ideology, Symbolic Violence, Inter-faith Marriage, Gender Perspective, LanguageAbstract
This study aims at identifying and describing the meaning of symbolic violence in the use of Balinese language in inter-faith marriages from a gender perspective. Data collection methods used in this research are literature studies and interviews. The obtained symbolic violence data was triangulated to key informants who were determined by purposive sampling. The hegemonic ideology and symbolic violence of the use of Balinese language in inter-faith marriages are not merely linguistic phenomena but also cultural phenomena. Data analysis is based on semantic theory, symbolic violence from Bourdieu's perspective, and sociocultural interpretation. The results showed that inter-faith marriages in Bali gave rise to symbolic violence for all genders, both women and men. Terms containing symbolic violence in inter-faith marriages include Jero, Nyerod, Pattiwangi, Sentana Rajeg, Asu Pundung, Astepin Karang Hulu, Paid Bangkung, Tulah, Durwaka, and others. The symbolic violence of the use of Balinese language does not directly lead to the physical but makes an impression psychologically.
Downloads
References
Arnawa, N. (2022). Linguistic devices in traditional forms of Balinese humour. In Humour in Asian Cultures (pp. 62-87). Routledge.
Arnawa, N., Gunartha, I. W., & Sadwika, I. N. (2018). Balinese Hegemonic Politness in Awig-Awig of Desa Pakraman. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 8(11). http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0811.13.
Arnawa, N., Winaja, I. W., & Widanta, I. (2021). Metaphors about Balinese Women: From Semantic Analysis to Cultural Pragmatic Interpretations. Language Related Research, 12(5), 239-277. http://10.52547/LRR.12.5.10.
Ataboyev, I. M., & Turgunova, F. R. (2022). The concept of semantic field in linguistics. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 12(3), 319-324.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2020). Outline of a Theory of Practice. In The new social theory reader (pp. 80-86). Routledge.
Dwipayana, I. K. A., & Astawan, N. (2021). The Domination of Patriarchism In Inheritance Customary Systems.
Dwipayana, I., Adhi, K., & Adnyana, I. B. G. B. (2019). Legitimasi Hukum Adat Bali dalam Karya Sastra Kultural. Retorika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 12, 208-222.
Dwipayana, K. A., & Artajaya, G. S. (2018). Hegemoni ideologi feodalistis dalam karya sastra berlatar sosiokultural Bali. Jurnal Kajian Bali, 8(02).
Haryatmoko, D. (2007). Etika Komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Leech, G. N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguis.
Rusmini, O. (2000). Tarian Bumi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Rusmini, O. (2003). Kenanga. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Sadnyini, I. A. (2016). Sanksi Perkawinan Terlarang di Bali Dulu dan Kini. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.
Setia, P. (2014). Bali Menggugat. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Sobur, A. 2009. Analisis Teks Media, Suatu Pengantar untuk Analisis Wacana, Analisis Semiotik, dan Analisis Framing. Bandung: PT RemajaRosdakarya.
Soethama, G. A. (2006). Mandi Api. Jakarta: Kompas.
Wijaya, P. (1971). Bila Malam Bertambah Malam. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Windia, W. P. 2013. Perkawinan Pada Gelahang di Bali. Denpasar-Bali: Udayana University Press
