A case of defamation
Linguistic forensics study
Keywords:
Defamation, Lexical semantics, Grammatical semantics, Speech act, Linguistics forensicsAbstract
This article discusses lingual data based on defamation case analysis, lexical semantics, grammatical semantics, and analysis pragmatics (speech acts), which is part of studying linguistics forensics. Based on lingual data of defamation that has been analyzed based on these three points of view, the following findings were obtained; (1) based on the lexical-semantic analysis found meaning lexical/meaning of word denotation; (2) based on grammatical semantic analysis, is obtained the meaning of phrases, sentences, and discourse according to what is intended by the speaker; (3) there is a declarative illocutionary speech act from the speaker. Based on the results of this analysis, it can be concluded that an utterance belongs to defamation. Investigators can use this as one of the grounds for preparing investigative procedures and decision-making for sanctions laws for defamation actors.
Downloads
References
Astara, W. W. (2021). The urgency of restricting the making accessibility phrase in Article 27 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law from the human rights perspective in Indonesia. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(5).
Casim. (2019). Forensic Linguistic Study of Salted Fish Smell by Galih Ginanjar Against Fairus A Rafiq. Metabasa Journal, Vol.1 No 2 -December 2019, p. 22–28.
Coulthard, M. And Alison Johnson (Eds.). (2010). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. New York: Rouledge.
Frawley, W. (2013). Linguistic semantics. Routledge.
Kearns, K. (2017). Semantics. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Mintowati. (2016). Defamation: Forensic Linguistic Studies. Paramasastra, Vol.3 No. 2 – September 2016, p. 197–208 .
Pateda, M. (2001). Lexical Semantic. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta 300p.
Putra, E. D., Simpen, I. W., Sudipa, I. N., & Sedeng, I. N. (2022). Speech act in the learning process of a bilingual school. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 4(2), 232-240.
Sitompul, J. (2012). Cyberspace, cybercrimes, cyberlaw: tinjauan aspek hukum pidana. PT Tatanusa.
Soesilo, R. (1995). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP): Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal.
Sonnenburg-Winkler, S. L., Eslami, Z. R., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). Rater variation in pragmatic assessment: The impact of the linguistic background on peer-assessment and self-assessment. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 16(1), 67-85.
Sudana, I. G. P., & Yadnya, I. B. P. (2021). Semantic Adjustments in The Translation of English Memorandum. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 3(1), 270-279.
Surbakti, E. B., Sinar, T. S., & Setia, E. (2018). Engagement and Graduation in Text of the Law on Electronic Information and Transaction. KnE Social Sciences, 295-305.
Suryati, N. M., Suteja, I. W., & Jirnaya, I. K. (2022). Category of noun lexical meaning in balinese. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 4(2), 215-223.
Swandana, I. W., Artawa, I. K., Udayana, I. N., & Purnawati, K. W. (2022). The argument structure and its semantic role of reporting verbs in balinese language. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 4(2), 187-196.
Turrel, M. T. (2008). Malcolm Coulthard and Alisom Johnson 2007: An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London and New York: Routledge.
Warmadewi, A. A. I. M., Laksana, I. K. D., Simpen, I. W., & Budiarsa, M. (2022). Violation of cooperation principles in balinese language by influencers on social media instagram. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 4(2), 96-106.
