Constituent order of clauses in bima language and its typological indication
Keywords:
Constituent order, Pronominal clitics, Typological indication, Accusative, ErgativeAbstract
This article aims at describing the constituent order and its indications to linguistic typology. The Bima Language is used as the object to describe the constituent order and to give the language its typological indications. The data in this article were taken by elicitation with the speakers until the elicitation is fed up. The analysis begins with assessing the clauses of the Bima Language syntactically involving several constructions in order to get the main patterns of constituent orders and its alternations. After that, the analysis continues to the explanation of the marking system of the cross-reference in the language in order to get how the language give marks on the predications and or on the arguments. Finally, the analysis comes to draw the typological indication of the combination of the patterns may have that of whether the Bima Language is to have an indication of accusative or ergative. Based on the analysis, it was found that the patterns of constituent orders of the Bima Langauge is the combination of S-V-O, O-V-S and V-O-S which indicates accusative. In addition, the pronominal clitics are always marked in S and A not in O.
Downloads
References
Adawiyah, R. (2021). Action Verbs with Notions of Hitting in Bima Language: The Study of Natural Semantics Metalanguage. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 3(01), 56-65.
Arafiq. (2005). Relasi Gramatikal Konstruksi Kausatif dan Aplikatif Bahasa Bima. (Tesis). Denpasar: Program Magister Linguistik, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Udayana.
Arafiq. (2020). The Syntax of Personal Pronouns in the Bima Language. International Linguistics Research, (3)2, 13-19.
Artawa, K. (1994). Ergativity in Balinede Syntax. Melbourne: La Trobe University.
Artawa, K. (2004). Balinese Language: A Typological Description. Denpasar: CV Bali Media Adikarsa.
Blake, B. J. (2004). Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blust, R. (2008). Is There A Bima-Sumba Subgroup? Oceanic Linguistics, 47(1) 23-37, University of Hawaii Press.
Chomsky, N. (1977). Essay of Form and Interpretation. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Language Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Second Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Craswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th Edition). Sage Publication, Inc.
Dixon, R. W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Donohue, M., & Grimes, C. E. (2008). Yet More on the position of the languages of Eastern Indeonesia and East Timor. Oceanin Linguistics, 47(1), 114-158.
Fahmiyanto, F. Y. (2016). Kalimat Perintah Bahasa Indonesia dalam Bahasa Petunjuk (Skripsi). Yogyakarta: Program Studi Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Bahasa Indonesia, Universitas Negri Yogyakarta.
Fox, C. (2014). The Semantic of Imperatives. In Handbook of Contemporarry Semantic Theory (Second Edition). United Kingdom: University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park.
Laksana, I. K. D., Yadnya, I. B. P., & Udu, S. (2021). Batata Construction of Cia-Cia Language in Traditional Medicine. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 3(2), 108-117.
Levshina, N. (2019). Based Typology and Word Order Entropy: A Study Based on Universal Dependency. Linguistic Typology, 533-572, De Gruyter Mouton.
Mahsun. (2006). Distribusi dan Pemetaan Varian-Varian Bahasa Mbojo. Yogyakarta: Media Gama.
Mbete, A. M. (2000). Kekerabatan Bahasa Bali, Sasak, Sumbawa. Laporan Penelitian. Denpasar: Program Pascasarjana. Universitas Udayana.
Noviatri. (2011). Kalimat Imperatif Bahasa Minangkabau. Padang: Minangkabau Press.
Park, S.-H., & Yi, E. (2021). Perception_Production Asummetry for Korean Double Accusative. Linguistic Research, 38(1), 27-52.
Purnawati, K. W., Krisnawati, N. P., & Artawa, K. (2020). Alignments of Coreferential Grammatical Functions in Indonesian. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(8), 897-905.
Rachman, A. (1984). Morfologi Kata Kerja Bahasa Bima. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Bahasa Daerah, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Samarin, W. J. (1988). Ilmu Bahasa Lapangan (J. S. Badudu Penerjemah). Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Satyawati, M. S., Purnawati, K. W., & Kardana, I. N. (2019). Verbal Expressions and Argument Engagement in the Clause of Bimanese Language. Mozaik Humaniora, 19(2), 181-193.
Siwi, P. (2021). Siladang Symtax: A Study of Grammar Typology. Annual International Conference on Language and Literatire (AICLL) (pp. 541-549). KnE Social Science.
Sudaryanto. (1998). Metode Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Swandana, I. W., Artawa, I. K., Udayana, I. N., & Purnawati, K. W. (2022). The argument structure and its semantic role of reporting verbs in balinese language. The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), 4(2), 187-196.
Wouk, F. (2010). Voice and Transitivity in Bimanese: A Discourse Perspective. The 6th International East Nusantara Conference on Language and Culture (ENUS 2010), (pp. 34-46). Kupang.
Wouk, F., & Arafiq. (2016). The Particle Kai in Bimanese. Oceanic Linguistics, 55(2), 319-349.
