The meaning of initiating non-departmental law on an international treaty perspective
Keywords:
Legal Meaning, Non-Departmental Initiator, International AgreementAbstract
The issuance of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 2000 concerning International Agreements, is the legal basis relating to international agreements, if observed by Law no. 24 of 2000 concerning International Treaties has not been revised for a long time, although over time there have been many developments from an international perspective. Article 17 paragraph 2 of Law no. 24 of 2000 concerning International Treaties states that a copy of the official text of each international agreement is submitted to state institutions and government agencies, both departmental and non-departmental initiators. Whereas in the provisions of Article 17 paragraph 2 of Law no. 24 of 2000 concerning the International Agreement on the phrase "non-department initiating" in this case the legal meaning of the phrase "non-departmental initiator" creates a vague norm (vague norm) which results in legal uncertainty regarding the regulation of the article which does not explain what what is meant by ''non-departmental initiator''. That it can be called containing the interpretation of a vague norm in this case is strengthened by the absence of a significant explanation and or a clear and directed explanation to explain the meaning of "non-departmental initiator". The meaning of the phrase "non-departmental initiator" can lead to a vague norm (vague norm) which results in legal uncertainty regarding the regulation of Article 17 paragraph 2 of Law no. 24 of 2000 concerning International Treaties.
Downloads
References
Al Banna, M. (2020). International Law and the Challenges of Transboundary Watercourses Governance: The Blue Nile Dam Controversy. In Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility—Volume 2 (pp. 105-121). Springer, Cham.
Aletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preoţiuc-Pietro, D., & Lampos, V. (2016). Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A natural language processing perspective. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e93.
Bleicher, J. (2017). Contemporary hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as method, philosophy and critique (Vol. 2). Routledge.
Budianto, A. (2020). Legal Research Methodology Reposition in Research on Social Science. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1339-1346.
Gautama, S., & Hornick, R. N. (2022). An introduction to Indonesian law: Unity in diversity. Penerbit Alumni.
Kelsen, H., & Trevino, A. J. (2017). General theory of law & state. Routledge.
Langford, P., Bryan, I., & McGarry, J. (Eds.). (2019). Hans Kelsen and the natural law tradition. Brill.
Lawton, S. B. (2012). State education policy formation: The case of Arizona’s English language learner legislation. American Journal of Education, 118(4), 455-487.
Michael, T. (2022). Unraveling the Importance of Democracy in Formation Legislation. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(4), 20-24.
Nováčková, D., & Vnuková, J. (2021). Competition issues including in the international agreements of the Eropean Union. Juridical Tribune Journal= Tribuna Juridica, 11(2), 234-250.
Pound, R. (2012). The ideal element in law. Liberty Fund.
Selznick, P. (2020). Law, society, and industrial justice (Vol. 30). Quid Pro Books.
Wiens, D. (2012). Prescribing institutions without ideal theory.
