Phonological Aspects of Korean Tourism Humour in Bali- Indonesia
Research on the phonological aspects of Korean tour guide humour is focused on research on the differences in phonemic sounds between Korean and Indonesian, in which, sounds that are difficult to be pronounced by Indonesian tourist guider for Korean can be used in creating humour. Besides, this study also explains the phonological aspects used in Korean tour guide humour. This research applied a descriptive qualitative approach. The data derived from the Korean tour guiders’ utterances. Furthermore, it also applied the literature method. Theories used are generative phonological theory, contact phonology and semantic humour theory. The results of this study indicate that there are specific differences between phonemes in Korean and Indonesian that can be used to create humorous effects. The phonemes include / p /, / b /, / t /, / d /, / k /, / g /, c /, and / j / which are only allophones in Korean but are different phonemes in Indonesian. There are also phonemes / t /, / tt /, / th /, / k /, / kk /, / kh /, / p /, / pp /, / ph /, / c /, / cc /, / ch /, / s / and / ss / which in Korean are contrasted, but in Indonesian they are only free variations. The phonological aspects used in Korean tour guide humour include sound substitution, insertion, sound absorption and a combined process.
Borisova, T. Linguistic Aspects of The Contemporary Theories of Humour.
Chaer, A. (1994). Linguistik umum. Jakarta,, Indonesia: Rineka Cipta.
Jumail, M., Par, S. S. T., & Par, M. (2014). Teknik Pemanduan Wisata. Penerbit Andi.
Latupeirissa, D. S. (2019) Interferensi Fonologis Bahasa Melayu Kupang Terhadap Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Peristiwa Tutur Masyarakat Melayu Kupang: Sebuah Kajian Deskriptif.
Leiper, N., & Hing, N. (1998). Trends in Asia‐Pacific tourism in 1997‐98: from optimism to uncertainty. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
Mak, A. H., Wong, K. K., & Chang, R. C. (2011). Critical issues affecting the service quality and professionalism of the tour guides in Hong Kong and Macau. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1442-1452.
Murata, K. (2014). An empirical cross-cultural study of humour in business meetings in New Zealand and Japan. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 251-265.
Murdana, I. K., Budiarsa, M., Suastra, I. M., & Mbete, A. M. (1983). English Language Politeness of Tourist Guides in Bali. E-Journal of Linguistics.
Myers, P. D. (2020). A Grammar of Transcriptions in 2 Esdras: Text, Philology, Phonology (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge).
Silva, K. B., & Mattos, J. B. (2020). A spatial approach for the management of groundwater quality in tourist destinations. Tourism Management, 79, 104079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104079
Smith, R., & Rathcke, T. (2020). Dialectal phonology constrains the phonetics of prominence. Journal of Phonetics, 78, 100934.
Sutawa, G. K. (2012). Issues on Bali tourism development and community empowerment to support sustainable tourism development. Procedia economics and finance, 4(1), 413-422.
Volenec, V., & Reiss, C. (2020). Formal Generative Phonology. Radical: A Journal of Phonology, 2, 1-65.
Wijana, I. D. P. (2003). Kartun: studi tentang permainan bahasa. Ombak.